Talk:Adam's Venture: Chronicles: Difference between revisions

Latest revision as of 10:41, 8 October 2018

Move the "Adam's Venture Chronicles" page to "Adam's Venture: Chronicles"

The "Adam's Venture Chronicles" page should be moved to "Adam's Venture: Chronicles" so that it matches with the compatibility list and its page on the PlayStation Store (As a side note, I would suggest that page moves be accessible to all autoconfirmed users (like it is on Wikipedia) since all edits on here are checked by moderators anyway.)
--Creeperjedi (talk) 23:52, 6 October 2018 (UTC)

Thanks, I moved the page. However, the change you requested for move rights might cause a few issues. We can't segregate which type of pages users can move and which type they can't. So, users will be able to move even template pages which if incorrectly accepted could wreck the entire wiki. So for the time being, I'd prefer having move rights restricted to only bureaucrats and admins. But I do have a few changes in mind that I want make to moderation such as removing most talk pages from being moderated and so forth. Also, it's worth noting that we won't ever be as open as Wikipedia as we have a considerably smaller moderator team and can easily be spammed with. Dolphin's wiki got hit with a ton of spam in the past too that caused a lot of issues. Easier to simply ping a bureaucrat or admin for a page to be moved.
--HerrHulaHoop (talk) 20:19, 7 October 2018 (UTC)

Thank you for the move. With regards to my request, I apologize if I sounded arrogant. I just wanted to let people have an easier time help the wiki, but didn't realize that this also opens the gate for vandalism/spam.
--Creeperjedi (talk) 22:24, 7 October 2018 (UTC)

No problem! Didn't come off as arrogant at all :D Wikipedia needs to add emoji support LOL

We have an auto-moderated role for trusted contributors whose edits skip moderation altogether. But again, this is an all-or-nothing right. Mediawiki doesn't let us cascade rights to give powers for some pages and restrict for others. So we might have to end up protecting template pages and such if we let a lot of people skip moderation with the role. I guess we'll have to fine-tune rights as we go along.
--HerrHulaHoop (talk) 10:41, 8 October 2018 (UTC)

@@ Line 4: / Line 4: @@
 (As a side note, I would suggest that page moves be accessible to all autoconfirmed users (like it is on Wikipedia) since all edits on here are checked by moderators anyway.)<br /> --[[User:Creeperjedi|Creeperjedi]] ([[User talk:Creeperjedi|talk]]) 23:52, 6 October 2018 (UTC)
-: Thanks, I moved the page. However, the change you requested for move rights might cause a few issues. We can't segregate which type of pages users can move and which type they can't. So, users will be able to move even template pages which if incorrectly accepted could wreck the entire wiki. So for the time being, I'd prefer having move rights restricted to only bureaucrats and admins. But I do have a few changes in mind that I want make to moderation such as removing most talk pages from being moderated and so forth. Also, it's worth noting that we won't ever be as open as Wikipedia as we have a considerably smaller moderator team and can easily be spammed with. Dolphin's wiki got hit with a ton of spam in the past too that caused a lot of issues. Easier simply to ping a bureaucrat or admin for a page to be moved.<br /> --[[User:HerrHulaHoop|HerrHulaHoop]] ([[User talk:HerrHulaHoop|talk]]) 20:19, 7 October 2018 (UTC)
+: Thanks, I moved the page. However, the change you requested for move rights might cause a few issues. We can't segregate which type of pages users can move and which type they can't. So, users will be able to move even template pages which if incorrectly accepted could wreck the entire wiki. So for the time being, I'd prefer having move rights restricted to only bureaucrats and admins. But I do have a few changes in mind that I want make to moderation such as removing most talk pages from being moderated and so forth. Also, it's worth noting that we won't ever be as open as Wikipedia as we have a considerably smaller moderator team and can easily be spammed with. Dolphin's wiki got hit with a ton of spam in the past too that caused a lot of issues. Easier to simply ping a bureaucrat or admin for a page to be moved.<br /> --[[User:HerrHulaHoop|HerrHulaHoop]] ([[User talk:HerrHulaHoop|talk]]) 20:19, 7 October 2018 (UTC)
 :: Thank you for the move. With regards to my request, I apologize if I sounded arrogant. I just wanted to let people have an easier time help the wiki, but didn't realize that this also opens the gate for vandalism/spam.<br /> --[[User:Creeperjedi|Creeperjedi]] ([[User talk:Creeperjedi|talk]]) 22:24, 7 October 2018 (UTC)
+::: No problem! Didn't come off as arrogant at all :D Wikipedia needs to add emoji support LOL
+::: We have an auto-moderated role for trusted contributors whose edits skip moderation altogether. But again, this is an all-or-nothing right. Mediawiki doesn't let us cascade rights to give powers for some pages and restrict for others. So we might have to end up protecting template pages and such if we let a lot of people skip moderation with the role. I guess we'll have to fine-tune rights as we go along.<br /> --[[User:HerrHulaHoop|HerrHulaHoop]] ([[User talk:HerrHulaHoop|talk]]) 10:41, 8 October 2018 (UTC)